Replies to post #22256 on Electronic Cigarettes International Group Ltd fka

[NewbieViewbie]

30,000 NO!!!!!!!!

[newlonginvest]

Around 67000 and of course NO

[Bjdev89]

Let's be careful not to double count.

[SPORTYNORTY]

Thank you jb, you not only stepped up, but your diligence in this tasking is impressive and admirable.

Working together, all of us share holders for a common goal, unifies us, and gives us a microphone by which ECIG must be accountable to.

Great job, please keep em coming.

Regards,

SPORTY

[BriOnH]

Can't answer no or yes yet, but will let you know.

Greatly appreciate your work on this. I'd even email you a scan of my choice (with any very personal info blacked out - acct numbers, social, whatever may be, never done this before) to keep on record if the vote goes opposite of what shareholders want.

[BrutalTruth]

3,776,840 no votes can be added to this from my article in the comments section. I'm not sure if anyone has already included these or not, but if not then that's more than 20 million shares voting no.

http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/1107010-edward-vranic-cfa/3618685-vote-no-to-ecigs-reverse-split

[BriOnH]

This list should be stickied and editable by JB

Even though I am not sure yet(it's most likely going to be no but I need more pro reasoning to weigh it fairly for myself), this is one of the most important issues to the ECIG community here.

80k shares as of now.

[AAAPENNYS]

Add my 323811 as well for a big fat NO. Thanks in advance

[Jimthorpe]

add me to the share count=appr 70000

[Razor09]

75k and hell no to both add me

[snoogler]

70000 NO

[Crazy Money]

The 411 at the end supposed to mean something?

[CapnLookOut]

My measly 20,000 says no (i did have 10,000 but i doubled down)

[mdg_25]

75,000 NO!