Replies to post #78418 on Ocata Therapeutics Inc fka OCAT

[elysse1kittycat]

I said what I did not to rain on anyone's parade as I am a significant holder of shares in the company myself.
My point is (and I think most older people like myself would agree), that many times in life the bet laid plans and endeavors in investing and other ventures in general can go awry because of unforeseen circumstances and events which can literally pull the rug out from the venture suddenly and without warning-if the endeavor includes money and others are also involved in its pursuit, imo the odds of hurdles and obstacles increase.
If Ocata existed in a vacuum, meaning they had unlimited funds from somewhere, no possible competition, an accommodating FDA, Big Pharma and politicians, and in general it was just a matter of time before everything came to fruition, I and just everyone else would go full steam ahead and would even more shares than we do.

[farviewhill]

Good observation and warning ELLLK,.
Unfortunately some posters don't appreciate this kind of discussion,
but I sure appreciate it.
They seem to want a Yahoo kind of board.

Biotech history has many examples of a promising phase 2 biotech,whose
research potentially seriously challenges some larger entity, so for a variety of reasons from needed operating capital, to management wanting to cash out rich, they just get bought out friendly or otherwise, and the acquiring company often 'buries' the science.
The Roche's and the Pfizer's of the world with billion dollar drugs for wet and dry macular degeneration play hard ball.