It's a third party in my opinion an has nothing to do with REDG. It's too REAL to go that low. Multibillion dollar company will not ask for REDG to be its publisher if it's not real.
It is just dribble. It is written at the 5th grade level at best. There is no investigative angle to it at all other then quoting previous outstanding shares vs current outstanding shares with no attempt at explaining why the new shares were released. REDG has an actual product which we have all seen unlike almost every other penny stock out there.
It is just taking its time in getting up and going... Which is why as the "article" states has gone up and down as products have been delayed. In addition, the new shares are from notes that were required for the growth and operation of the company, which have all stopped now anyways. Therefore the article has ZERO bearing on the current state of REDG.
They could have made an argument just as easy in support of REDG, but decided they could get more attention by bashing with 2 year old news about a 3rd party promotion that redg had absolutely nothing to do with and Benny came out with PR saying that as well. I see why you like their site, you fit right in.