Jcg,
Yes, this is a fact of circumstance. Had Chip or Iain (or ANY other CEO) been present "currently," the pps would be no different. I state again...any attempt by Laura to promote the stock will result in significantly greater dilution while the pps remains precisely at .0001.
I do not feel there exists a more angry shareholder on this site than myself (have a look back to my posts from January of this year when the r/s was RE-announced).
I have lost far more than the average investor here. Yet I attempt to step back to view matters for what I feel they are, and I believe my post is quite accurate. This doesn't place a dollar in my empty pocket, however, it may prove valuable to me in the longer run (difficult to imagine the word "longer" could still apply).
JMO...
Best,
BC