InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cheynew

12/08/14 8:58 AM

#198798 RE: biopharm #198797

Our team is showing little interest in ever resolving either suit.
icon url

edcpf

12/08/14 9:07 AM

#198803 RE: biopharm #198797

I'm not a lawyer but. From Peregrine's perspective, if the Phase III preliminary results are good, then there's certainly more weight in the argument that CSM delayed the treatment to Phase III and market by x months. From CSM's perspective, they could wager on the results being bad, in that case they could lose less. By some estimates, June could be around the time of the first look-in.
icon url

Protector

12/08/14 4:40 PM

#198853 RE: biopharm #198797

bio, I am sure this delay has NOTHING to do with some Science results of PPHM's clinical trials.

There may have been an unexpected development :)