InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sleekscape

12/06/14 11:09 AM

#95252 RE: merushn #95249

Good post merushn, but those numbers only represented 4 dispensaries in Nevada.
Thanks very much for providing your Calculations!

In addition, TRTC has:
2 cultivation facilities in Nevada $30M
2 production facilities in Nevada $30M
Oakland Lab $5M
Edible Garden with NB Plants Acquisition $10M

So that's an additional $75M in revenue


And then we have 2015 events which will add more revenue:
Oakland BLUM acquisition $20M
Edibles Acqusition $6M
Southern California Lab $5M
Increase in EG penetration $10M

So that's another $41M in revenue


If you want to rework your numbers, would love to see them.

Sleek
icon url

Dickybad

12/06/14 11:14 AM

#95255 RE: merushn #95249

Very good evaluation of the "revenue/float" to the PPS, with the Nevada project. But, the 125 mil is an estimate of the dispensary annual revenues. The 2 Cultivation/Production could add another 30 mil each or 60 mil. Plus EG and the Oakland Lab numbers. The primary shareholders will not put their 72 million into the float (fully diluted), they will still want to hold majority ownership. Thanks
icon url

Dickybad

12/06/14 11:16 AM

#95257 RE: merushn #95249

Sorry merushn, and sleek, I didn't know Sleek already responded to you.
icon url

Art Vandeley

12/06/14 11:26 AM

#95261 RE: merushn #95249

you do understand that float and O/S are not the same thing?