In regards to the available facts I have obtained and advanced here on this board from three persons that each held a position of authority at Bourque Industries during the time John Bourque was present and exercised his position of overseer in regards to running the company and creation of Kryron alloys for testing and demonstrations, each of these persons have stated as facts observed by each that "All of the Kryron alloys made for testing were bogus, as in the alloys used were either purchased from established manufactures or created using established alloy manufacturing methods that contained ingredients far too expensive for a viable product customers were willing to spend to obtain superior properties of a "new" alloy."
Nothing stated by me is done in a tone to disparage (express a negative opinion) against Bourque Industries, but to simple put forth on this board my opinion of statements received by me, as interpretive by me for the translation as my opinion of what I understood by the comments received by me from these three persons.
It is clear that my paraphrasing of the text I enclose in the about quotes at the beginning of this post is of a judgment of mine that derives not from direct observations as firsthand (primary or original) knowledge, but only exist here on this board as hearsay.
These three facts remain:
(1) Those present at the Bourque Industries facility during a live demonstration were told that the armor plates were created from the Kryron Process, this without any verification to support such statement.
(2) John Bourque would propagate a false reality if actual cost to product an armor plate were much higher that the amount sold for purchase.
(3) It is well established that metallic armor plates perform better than ceramic (nonmetallic minerals) plates.
Doug
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
