News 
Market Data 
Discover
Replies to post #254586 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)
The future of television. Americans are ditching cable in favor
of Netflix and other streaming-video services. Is streaming the future of TV?
By The Week Staff | 8:00am ET
Welcome to the future of television.
How many people are switching?
About 5 million people signed up for Netflix, Hulu, and other low-
cost -streaming-video services in 2013, so they could watch shows
and movies via the internet. Many of these people simultaneously
"cut the cord" on their pay-TV subscriptions, resulting in a net
decline of 250,000 cable subscribers that year — the first time
that total has gone down. While cable companies still have 56
million subscribers among them, Netflix alone has rapidly amassed
36 million. That number is expected to keep rising, as people
switch to the cheaper alternative of watching TV and movies on
computers and TVs hooked up to the internet. Some networks already
offer cable subscribers the option to stream their content, but
next year both HBO and CBS will launch streaming services that
don't require a cable subscription — the start, some say, of an
"à la carte" subscription model. "The television industry is in
transformation," says media analyst Jeffrey Kagan. "This entire
space is going to be a completely different space in five years."
Why are cable subscribers moving to streaming?
The biggest factor is cost. Cable subscribers pay an average of
$85.80 a month (with many paying well over $100), yet watch only
about 17 of the 189 channels in their cable bundle. Netflix, in
contrast, costs just $9.99 a month. While that subscription doesn't
provide access to the latest episodes of CBS's Big Bang Theory,
HBO's Game of Thrones, or AMC's The Walking Dead — hit shows
generally arrive on Netflix a year after their network premiere —
it does open up a vast library of Hollywood films, documentaries,
and TV shows. To entice potential subscribers, Netflix, Amazon
Prime, and other streaming services also produce their own
exclusive series, such as Netflix's acclaimed political drama,
House of Cards. Young people, in particular, are adopting this new
model of obtaining entertainment: Only 24 percent of 18- to 24-
year-olds have cable, whereas 61 percent pay for a stand-alone
streaming service.
What are they watching?
The rise of streaming has created a bigger appetite for big-budget,
high-quality dramatic series like House of Cards and Showtime's
Homeland. Unlike regular, "appointment" TV sitcoms and dramas
created by CBS, NBC, and ABC, which limit viewers to one or two
episodes a week, streaming allows people to devour several hours of
a narrative show in one sitting. Streaming firms, in fact, actively
encourage this "binge watching": When Netflix releases shows,
including its own original series, it makes all the episodes
available at once; when viewers finish one episode, the next
one automatically loads up. For one unnamed serialized drama on
Netflix, 25 percent of viewers finished the entire 13-episode
season in just two days, while 48 percent took only a week. "The
internet," says Netflix executive Ted Sarandos, "is attuning people
to get what they want when they want it."
Does that mean cable is doomed?
No. Many viewers aren't willing to wait months or a year for their
favorite shows to be available online. And an "à la carte" system
may be more expensive than people think. The most popular series
are scattered across a number of channels, and the cost of
subscribing to all these individually — HBO's service alone will be
at least $15 a month — could well be as much as a cable bundle.
But the biggest weapon in cable's armory is sports. As long as
football, basketball, baseball, and hockey fans require a cable
subscription to follow their teams, then Verizon, Time Warner,
and the others can continue wrapping sports channels into big,
expensive bundles. Given how lucrative the status quo is for
everyone involved, traditional networks will mightily resist
changing their business model. So HBO, CBS, and other traditional
networks will try to walk a fine line by pricing their "over-the-
top" streaming services low enough to appeal to the growing army of
cord cutters but not so low as to encourage most cable subscribers
to join the exodus.
So what is going to change?
For many TV viewers — sports fans in particular — not much, at
least not in the immediate future. Change in media-consumption
habits doesn't happen overnight; after all, AOL still has 2.3
million customers paying for dial-up internet. But as more and more
people switch to streaming over the next few years, and tech-savvy
millennials replace Baby Boomers as the largest segment of TV
consumers, market pressures will grow on networks and cable
companies to offer cheaper, more customized menus of content.
Inevitably, streaming will disrupt TV the same way the internet
disrupted the music and print-media industries — by "unbundling"
content and making it cheaper. "The convenience of on-demand
viewing just makes sense for a lot of people," says Roy Price,
vice president of Amazon Studios. "This is the new world of TV."
Data-driven drama
When Netflix committed $100 million for the first two seasons of
House of Cards, it wasn't as big a gamble as it looked. Netflix
executives knew from data analysis of its subscribers' viewing
habits that many of them enjoyed the work of creator David Fincher
and star Kevin Spacey, as well as the British miniseries on which
the show was based. Different Netflix users were even shown
targeted trailers: Subscribers who'd previously watched Spacey
movies saw trailers focused on him; viewers who'd liked Thelma &
Louise were shown the drama's female characters. Streaming is a
two-way street of data, enabling Netflix to study not just what
subscribers watch but also how they watch it. It can even tell
whether viewers fast-forward through the credits or when they pause
a show. This feedback helps show creators to tailor their decisions
to viewers' preferences about which characters to develop and which
color palettes and scenery to feature. Rather than "shooting a
shotgun into the night sky and hoping they hit something," says
Rick Smolan, author of The Human Face of Big Data, "these guys know
what they're aiming at." The danger, of course, is that high-
quality TV series will go down the same path as Hollywood movies,
with creators and networks looking to replicate past success
instead of striving for quality and originality.
