How about showing us proof that those buying these shares aren't associated with SEO. Of course that is impossible. Fact of the matter is someone is buying these shares and it certainly is not your average retail investor. So why don't you tell us who you think is buying and then provide us with proof.
Anyone with a basic understanding of English would have understood that the 5 to 6 times more shares comment was made in response to a speculation on who was lending the money (bonds)! The response was saying that IF SEO was making the toxic loans then it would net him more shares than IF he has participated in the "offering" at .075 !
The IF is not a definitive statement but just pointing out the would be upshot of a particular suggested scenario !
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
