Well...Retodd brought up the possibility that someone at mcig could have written the PR that way to get a bounce in the pps. I know he doesn't believe that happened and nor do I, but like Al100 just posted that mcig should quickly do another PR to correct the PR with very deep apologises to whomever may have been mislead.
They not, however, as it is a red flag to an admitted false and misleading statement.
As the stomach turns, eh?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
