Replies to post #20778 on Singlepoint Inc (SING)

[jgusciora]

it's pretty clear in the details of the Six Sigma that reproducing 2013 was a long shot at best.

How do you decide that in that agreement it is clear that those type revenues would be a long shot to reach beyond 2013? To me it appears that they threw numbers out there to make people think that those would be the revs in the near future. Not unlike that chart that keeps getting posted... What is the 4 year forecast? 40 million or something? But when that time comes and goes and revs are no where near predictions you will still have people explaining why it is a good business idea that those revs were not obtained.

[stuntmanpatch]

this is where you know something is going on.

That Sigma deal directly impacts the shareholders. How can you not be furious? Any long in their right mind would me. The deception here is ridiculous.

Sigma has the rights to an additional 16 million restricted shares of SinglePoint Inc.’s common stock to be issued in tranches alongside revenue benchmarks to be met by Sigma. Benchmark figures to be reached include $500,000, $750,000, $1,000,000 and $2,000,000 derived from revenues earned by assets included in the acquisition.

All those shares diluting your holding and you are just fine with not giving a crap. Haha. Look to the future. Haha.

I think it's critically important to understand the past.
Averaging the past three years of issuance, we are on pace to grow the SS with well over 100mm a year.

At that rate Singlepoint will need to have those revenues in three years to support the bloated SS. Yet, still be struggling at .01 or lower.