Replies to post #13788 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[SoxFan]

I hate to clue you in but there is no negotiations with TC hard or otherwise. To think there is negotiations going on is nothing but fantasy.

[PumpersExposed]

Here is my take :

- the AOT reduces viscosity, confirmed by independent Laboratory

Like all other "products" from this company, there has never been truly third party testing. If you consider the RMOTC third party, then consider there was no baseline set without the AOT in-line, and all testing was performed by STWA. Now the TCPL testing WAS as they hired a third party firm. And we now know the results of that. Testing shut down early, AOT sent packing, final lease payment withheld.

- it could be better, depending on the power supply, which may not be solely about "power" but optimal tweeking of electric field, depending on dynamic parameters

There are these new inventions called variable and adjustable power supplies. I'm sure one was tried. That would have been part of the testing, or pure and absolute incompetence to not be. Not much you can do about the field when you are inside a pipe, and have to consider oil flow.

the fate of 1 AOT is irrelevant, what is needed, if needed by TC, is tens of them, although everyone is focused on this unit

If they can't even sell or prove one, many is not in the cards. Just look back on any one of their magical as-seen-on-tv devices.

TC is negociating hard, and the drama about the fate of the test unit is part of that

If not wanting an item is "negotiating".. then I guess this might be true.

Greg is not blinking, he sent 4 messages to TC in the 10Q : efficacy of AOT is proven, the question raised by TC are mostly due to "constraints" that can be taken care of, he has other businesses to take care of, he is not afraid to upset shareholders in the short term

Amazing! Brilliant! don't pick up a phone.. don't email.. don't hold a meeting.. NO!.. send out code via a QR!!! I think I've pretty well heard it all now.

- he has always said that midstream is long to market compared to upstream, and he has always said that he was seeking additional funds, this also being part of STWA strategy,

Oil is oil. Either this thing works or it doesn't. Considering their absolute failure to ever bring a product to market, I wouldn't take their words of wisdom too seriously. One thing we both CAN agree on though, is pursuing more funds has been part of STWA's strategy for over a decade.

- the shareholders just sent another message : a total of 1 % shares sold in those two "panic" days

Buyers also sent a message... they ain't buy'n it.