InvestorsHub Logo

JoeyJoe321

11/11/14 12:14 AM

#23823 RE: SCJCPA #23821

Nice! do you think we'll be green tomorrow?

markp1950

11/11/14 8:32 AM

#23858 RE: SCJCPA #23821

I would look at the “income before other income/expenses” instead of net income.


And would that take into account income spent on expansion. That is one problem that I see on this board and other boards. SolarCity makes income but they do move income into expansion. So they keep on expanding, but don't show bottom line income.
SLTD does have expenses. They have to invest in the cell. That takes away from bottom line income. They want to open other locations, that comes off bottom line income.
They don't see that a company reinvesting in the business expanding means that the company might not show income, or show a loss for years, yet the stock goes up because the company is getting bigger.
SCTY abd TSLA are a perfect example.
SLTD is a development company. And like the case with MD, they might show a "cost" of $3.8 mil, but it still will add $7.5 mil on revenue each year.
And they don't see that when comparing companies. While SCTY may or may not showing bottom line profit, they are adding hundreds of new employees.

Aevora

11/12/14 8:07 AM

#24296 RE: SCJCPA #23821

They do have to lower those overhead expenses... I concur with you. Nothing to worry about. They are heading northbound!!!

Solid penny and wont be at this level for long...

$sltd