InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Md4Ob

11/07/14 9:32 PM

#16033 RE: was CUIN2 #16032

True. Technically only 51% approval would be needed. I suspect that the largest holders would constitute the 51%. IMO, of course I could be wrong. However, several of my friends are VC guys who, along with me, believe that SPORT is worth more in the private equity arena where the profit can be increased without the benefit of increasing shareholder equity. Once the technology is made available, a public offering will be made furthering private equity profit. The percent profit made in private equity will be realized at the expense of those who have invested with Titan, stayed the course, and bought out for about 2.20 per share. If Titan were going to survive as we had believed the company would have released information at the expense of Transenterix 's recent release. There is too much coincidence and too little growth and of course anemic information forthwith from management. My hats off to the 20k/month PR firm; they paraded Titan on Wall Street and found a buyer rather than finding several institutional investors.
icon url

TitanGold20

11/07/14 10:14 PM

#16034 RE: was CUIN2 #16032

And certainly we will not approve $2.20 a share. Not sure where Md4OB got that number from