Well let me start out by paraphrasing what Mr. Sinclair expressed to me when I interviewed him, This is not an easy business, but what impresses me about SFRX is that they have not gone away and they have stuck it out and have a solid business plan. SFRX does not seek investor money for a single time period or season, then tell the investor they are out unless they are willing to ante up for the next season.
For me: A big C CHANGE for the industry. SFRX has oversight mainly the SEC and are fully reporting, another big C CHANGE for the industry. The CEO is not raking the shareholders for a BIG FAT pay check, another HUGE C CHANGE. I believe it is the C Changes to the industry that industry insiders are fighting hard against. That is a strong statement for me that SFRX is doing the right things to be successful in this business. SFRX is an industry disruptor, and I think its GREAT!
I have not seen any statement from SFRX that site 3 is dead and they plan to abandon the site.
It is also amazing to me that non expert people can have such a definitive opinion about the Juno site when they have no published, public or vetted credentials to back up their statement. No one is privilege to the conversations between the company and their Archaeologists. The SFRX Archaeologists have public records and independent organizations that have vetted and given credibility to their ability to give expert advise. I believe that I will go with SFRX's direction if it includes Juno because I know they have vetted expert advice.
$SFRX and GO SFRX!!!