Replies to post #4673 on NewMarket Technology (fka NWMT)

[oltimer]

Man, If i felt the way you did I would just sell and move on.

[eastunder]

SBC...

1) don't write a book and pass it off as a post
2) sell the stock
3) get off the board as moderator.

You mistrust everything about it and YOU ARE OUR MODERATOR. Plus practice what you preach...you do a great amount of cutting down others, but in a sly way. Perhaps you should read your past posts. Just click on your name and bore yourself to death. I spent the weekends going thru them all and I am a little bit shocked.

You say you want both side represented, aye? Ohhhhh Reallly?
Hummmm. More is spent on the negative then on the positive and most of that is your doing. INTERESTING.

Rick told you all about Tsheri/Charleoi. Why did you, and do you, continue to ignore that? Ya want PV to tell you himself?

Sell the stock. Move out. Move along. Any one who feels the way you do should...or they are idiots.

[Telephonics]

To add to your comment; Look at the pesonal investment PV and his family have in this operation and you'll get a much better understanding that challenges to his integrity and intentions are unsupportable.Should the company fail there is no shareholder who would suffer more than PV and his kin.

[wallacegg]

Ban the idiots but not the dissenters

[uloctralen]

SBC, do you beat your wife?

You don't?

Prove it.

Until then, I can only assume you are a wife-beater.

Does your wife wear long-sleeved shirts? Sunglasses?

She does?

Well, then it's obvious to me that she's trying to hide something. What could she be hiding, SBC? I'll tell you what she's hiding. Bruises. Bruises that you gave her.

Now it's up to you to clear your name.




Of course I'm joking, but this is the same kind of slanderous attack that Charleoi presents, and that you have apparently bought into. You wrote, "Charleoi provides his evidence to present his case..." to which I say, "WHAT evidence?" He brings up facts about the company that in and of themselves are not signs of wrongdoing, but then claims that they ARE. Coming in short on revenues etc. is no more "evidence" that Phil is a crook any more than your wife's long sleeves are "evidence" that you beat her.