Adding "forward looking statements" is merely window dressing to give the appearance of legitimacy, as penny stocks aren't granted coverage under Safe Harbor.
With or without it, they're pretty much allowed to say whatever they want, within reason, with little fear of being confronted by the SEC.
Does it make logical sense that swet would vet the Chile business plan? No... that is the business of Cobra crest as it is a license deal. No irrefutable logic to confirm or deny that progress short of obtaining that contract. Zero sense debating it as unless you are insider cobra crest we will not have access confirm or deny.
All information we have is from ceo; could he be completely lying? Yes. Could he be completely be telling the truth? Yes... does anyone have any solid information confirm/deny either? No... that's the bottom line.
Various ppl think no mattee what co doom/gloom others think it has potential but what is not emerging is 100 percent proof either way. I am prepared cite subjective information but if it's not 100 percent only proliferate endless debate
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
