InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,408.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.60
(
-0.11%
)
Bitcoin
65,772.47
(
1.24%
)

Replies to post #68196 on EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

Replies to #68196 on EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

dpaul007

10/30/14 1:23 PM

#68200 RE: Stock_Barber #68196

You just contradicted yourself! The tweet said, No, not all. You took it as saying "not at all" Reading is key.

PianoMan75

10/30/14 1:27 PM

#68204 RE: Stock_Barber #68196

Correct. And some that don't.

wobblenuts

10/30/14 1:29 PM

#68205 RE: Stock_Barber #68196

"No. Not all"



DOES NOT EQUAL

"Not at all"...



Reread it, you read it wrong.

$EPGL

tefftb

10/30/14 1:30 PM

#68207 RE: Stock_Barber #68196

i believe you may not be reading the question or answer correctly from a logic POV. i believe the EPGL IR person responded correctly to the question asked of them.

EPGL Shareholder Email Question: "Will all of the technologies that EPGL has in development with their partners require FDA clearances?

Answer: No. Not all.

and i believe you created the potentially misleading "not at all". I believe you may have created your own contradiction.

if the IR person was in court or being deposed, i believe his/her lawyer would have instructed them to stop with just the "No." it is technically correct. the rest was courtesy.