i believe you may not be reading the question or answer correctly from a logic POV. i believe the EPGL IR person responded correctly to the question asked of them.
EPGL Shareholder Email Question: "Will all of the technologies that EPGL has in development with their partners require FDA clearances?
Answer: No. Not all.
and i believe you created the potentially misleading "not at all". I believe you may have created your own contradiction.
if the IR person was in court or being deposed, i believe his/her lawyer would have instructed them to stop with just the "No." it is technically correct. the rest was courtesy.