If you were more thorough in your due diligence you would have noticed a rebuttal to that 2008 report.
"#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Slanderous Report
AUTHOR: Goldstein Lapayowker - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 22, 2008
This report is slanderous and patently false. The vendor, which is an out of state process server, who posted this message was paid in full for its services and then attempted to make additional demands for work that was never undertaken, performed or completed. We ultimately had to retain another entity to undertake the service of process and to bear an additional fee to replace the deficient services provided by the reporter. Lastly, the reporter lied to our office on numerous occassions to hide its failure to provide the services for which it was contracted and paid in FULL.
I don't defend management but I prefer ALL DATA POINTS be disclosed when doing proper due diligence
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
