InvestorsHub Logo

alias7

10/30/14 12:18 AM

#18224 RE: whatthehell #18223

The building having asking price 2.9 million is a fact curtesy of Bepractical. The 6.8 million loan due on building is a fact. You are the architect. You know building. You explain to us how that happens. All I can figure out is the mortgage is under water. I do know Michelle Peake claimed building was worth 35-50 million and CT believed worth 20 million. It was huge shock Sept 2013 when Intas did their own audit and got value 5 million for building and equipment. Neither myself nor CT had ever seen that For Sale notice asking 2.9 million. It is an extraordinary find that Bepractical made. However, consistent with Intas audit. Viropro is dead as a stock; but Viropro the story is very much alive. I appreciate efforts you and others are making to figure out the truth to the Viropro story. CT is a very honest person and worked very hard for 1 year for us share holders. I think I owe it to CT to bring truth to light and I believe real value of Alpha is big part of the true story.

alias7

10/30/14 9:44 AM

#18226 RE: whatthehell #18223

6.8 due bank loan on property asking price 2.9 million. The explanation is probably criminal scheme. CT discovered true value Alpha Sept 2013 with Vivo independent appraisal. Michelle Peake Director of Alpha from the very beginning and claimed Alpha worth 30-50 million. If CT had remained CEO, she certainly would have forced a complete investigation in Malaysia about missing million of dollars. Maybe the real motive behind removal CT by SH was to help those involved in a fraudulent bank loan stay out of Malaysian prison. If your real worry was Malaysian prison; your last concern in world would be share price Viropro. None of this helps Viropro investors a single bit; it's about cleaning up some of the mud SH tried to throw on one extremely honest woman.