LOL at Prime Time Agreement .... Didn't work out so well.
Prime Time Medical Litigation
After assuming control of the acquisition of Prime Time in August 2013, the Company discovered that the Seller of Prime Time (“Miklos”) failed to disclose that there were on-going audits with respect to Prime Time’s Medicare and Medicaid billings for periods prior to the consummation of the transaction. These audits have escalated and, as a result, Prime Time can no longer invoice Medicare and Medicaid for any products or services and be paid for such products and services until the outcome of the audits which could last at least two years. Also, as a result of other Medicare and Medicaid audits for periods prior to the consummation of the transaction, Medicare and Medicaid are demanding payments for products that Prime Time was paid prior to the closing of the transaction that were improper. It is estimated that Prime Time may owe Medicare and Medicaid up to $500,000 in improper payments and at least another $500,000 in accounts receivable that will not be paid to Prime Time pending the outcome of the audits. On March 13, 2014, after discovering numerous material differences between financial statements reproduced by the Company and the financial statements provided by Miklos in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement, coupled with the foregoing events and Medicare and Medicaid’s constraint on Prime Time’s business and payment stream, the Board of Directors of the Company determined that the business could no longer survive and thus opted to pursue a rescission of the completed transaction with Prime Time.
As a result of discoveries of fraud and misrepresentations in the acquisition of Prime Time described above, on March 18, 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against Mark R. Miklos in Miami-Dade County, Florida Case No.14007055CA01, alleging breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, fraudulent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty and damages. The company is seeking judgment against the Seller, restitution, rescission of the Purchase Agreement and Employment Agreement and return of all moneys paid to the Seller.
On March 19, 2014 the Company was served with a lawsuit filed by Mark Miklos against the Company and Anovent, Inc. in Hillsborough County, Florida Case No. 14-CA-2520 DIV K, alleging the following: breach of the Employment Agreement entered into with the Company; improper notice of termination; breach of the Short Term Note for $850,000; breach of Promissory Notes A and B for $500,000 each, and further includes an action to foreclose a security interest in personal property and intangibles as a result of the alleged defaults of the Notes and rights under the Security Agreement. The Company believes there is no merit to Mr. Miklos’ lawsuit and intends to defend itself aggressively.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
