Replies to post #53827 on Limitless Venture Group Inc. (LVGI)

[kaisdaboss88]

And if we lose our slam contract we are toast that right there is the money maker.ZEKE TALK TO YOUR BOY JF THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE!

[1nv3st0r_Gadg3t]

Sorry, Friend...but the DTCC isn't going to 'close down shop' on working Americans - UNLESS - they 'suspect fraud'. (And as notoriously 'slow' as they are to move, you can bet that when they do: they have "good cause" to do so!)

If $LVGI was "legit" - they the CEO would have done the 1st thing a CEO does with Shareholders when any 'issues' arise: COMMUNICATE. (Via 'official' channels...not via 'walkie-talkies', or any other 'non-official channel'. Especially, to not even "officially" release news of using Google Chat as the 'sounding-board'.........SMH...)

If $LVGI was "legit" - they would still be doing business! A halt to shares doesn't necessarily preclude doing business! (As a matter of fact - doing business is what would allow them to even PAY a legal team! Think about it...)

If $LVGI was "legit" - they would have 'officially' released information as an Investors Relations Release, that they'd retained Kogan (or ANY Attorney, for that matter) - and EXACTLY where the company stood!

If $LVGI was "legit" - why would the CEO 'supposedly' have "a buddy" - feeding him A TON OF QUESTIONS - but STILL not have the audacity to inform the shareholders of what's going on??

I have no idea why anyone would call this company "legit"...(and after reading my quick 'blurb' - do you?)