InvestorsHub Logo

DSTAT

10/23/14 1:18 PM

#76973 RE: stemcell #76972

There are claims that Moffitt is "running the show" but does anyone know him or Mr. Stanz personally? Can they verify that claim? Mr. Stanz, CEO, stated in black and white that there would be no reverse split.

Someone please explain exactly how they know that this is incorrect OR the idea that Moffitt is "running the show".

Seems like there's a lot of information that some claim they know floating around. Is this credible information?

Someone please clarify.

my2Mustangs

10/23/14 8:15 PM

#76977 RE: stemcell #76972

Float is more than that, just add up the numbers.

Sal was given 26B+ as "restricted" in the Nov. and Dec. timeframe of 2013

US Concrete and Kelso were given a total of 2.98B, also "restricted."

Adding just those 2 together we get a total of 29B+.

Then add the 4.344B OS of the end of year for 2012, but also in the 2012 disclosure it states that Aaron only has 3.5M preferred shares of the 4M preferred and 200M common he was given for BG Medical to be "acquired" by RightSmile. So 500K preferred was converted into 5B plus the 200M were somehow sold into an AS that was 4.35B common. How that is mathematically possible, I don't know, all I know is that if Aaron had "given back" the 500K preferred plus the 200M common there would have been a PR or something about it.

By the numbers provided by Aaron for the end of the year for 2013 the OS grand total would have been almost 34B(26B for Sal plus 2.98B for Kelso and US Concrete plus the OS at the end of 2012 puts us at the 34B number. Then the annual for 2013 states that even though those 29B+ given to Sal and the 2 "companies" were listed as "restricted" by the time the annual disclosure for 2013 was published Aaron stated that there were no restricted shares, so clearly he had lifted the "restrictions" on all the shares he had given to Sal and the 2 "companies."

Even with the "buyback" of 1.499 shares, the OS is still exceeding the AS by at least the other 1.499B, but Aaron's way of trying to "correct" it all was to just leave the 2 "companies" "restricted" shares out of the 1st quarter disclosure, but even just using the 26B+ given to Sal and then add the OS as of Dec. 2012 we have about 31B.

Aaron must have been thinking, "how can I fix this" so he leaves the 2.98B out of the 1st quarter disclosure, bringing the OS down to about 31B+ and then PRs a "buyback" for 1.499B to make it look like the OS is less than the AS but what about the other 1.499B to the other "company."

Just Aaron fartin under the sheets and then waving the sheets to let the stink out, but the reality is that by the end of the year numbers for 2013 and take off 1.499B for the "buyback" and we still have an OS of 31B+(Sal's 26B+ and add the OS of 2012 of 4.344)and then add the other 1.499B for a grand total of about 33B+ or -. Is that another "share buyback" PR I smell or did Aaron fart under the sheets again?

GL