Replies to post #10108 on Rambus (RMBS)

[lolo]

Yes, the document 'snipehumt' is BS,

but having earlier already sent a note to IR about them posting the redacted opposition to the samy demurrer,
and not having read your directive,
I did snag and post some recent mircon motion regarding the gag order. Entertaining in its vehemence, if not necessarily entirely legible...
I posted PDF files on Ramboids, where I can control them...
These were the motions filed before the most recent HJK hearing in SF.
Learning as we go,,,
LOLo

[lolo]

My Letter to RMBS IR

sent this morning to the ladies whose email you provided:

"Subject: Redacted Opposition to Samsmug demurrer

Dear Rambus;

During the recent earnings conference call, Mr. Danforth made pointed references
to the document of the subject line, apparently filed in the August 30 2005
timeframe.

As the Honorable Judge Kramer has declared those documents moot and returned
them to Rambus, they are not to be found on the court's website,
if they were ever there.

The redacted version was apparently publicly available for awhile, but it is
nowhere to be found. I've spent at least 4 hours searching the web for it, and
it is simply not findable by me.

I think it would be entirely appropriate to make that document more readily
available to the public by hanging it on your website.

Especially since Mr. Danforth did encourage us (during the CC) to review that
REDACTED document, I think you have a duty to provide it in some form or other.
If you do not have the authority to make this decision, please forward this note
to the cognizant and responsible individual at Rambus who can do it.

If it is not appropriate to hang it on your website, then Please provide a paper
copy, and I will come by to pick it up, this afternoon.

Thanks in advance,"

We'll see what happens now...

LOLo