Instead of again switching the subject you created, try reading your last 2 posts and consider their value to people interested in investment. Accept that you are the one focused on personal attacks - perhaps because you are miffed that I pointed out your marketing idea to give away the product was a zero, instead of your idea that nxt mgmt was a zero for not thinking of your idea - I don't hear any of your followers arguing against my last points below.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=107337654 NXT goal is twice the power at half the cost so if one company got all that tech free they would cut their price so far that no one else could afford to lease the tech from nxt. Giving your product away free to one company would make them dominant, so the others either couldn't compete or would look for alternatives. You would end up supplying the dominant player free. That is a biz model they don't teach in school, except comedy class.
I have to admit that Teq is highly controversial and has some real issues. The last time I checked we are all Long, on the same team and want the same outcome. Why you have to bring so much drama to the table I'm not sure. I want Natcore to go to $10 or more quickly so we all win big. Why do you have to argue and put down everyone who technically are on your team? I'm scratching my head here as all Mac is doing is defending the rest of us. This is not a Harvard MBA board so maybe you should be the one to try another board instead of us.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
