InvestorsHub Logo

Top Penny

10/21/14 12:37 PM

#92601 RE: cottonmather #92600

How do you explain the fact that most would side with me and completely disagree with everything you say? How would you explain that?

-IMHO

Top Penny

10/21/14 1:52 PM

#92607 RE: cottonmather #92600

MMTC still has all of it's patents, if they didn't have their patents the university collaboration would be illegal. The filings spell it out in black and white. The civil action Alpine filed on May 16, 2012 was thrown out of court for lack of jurisdiction. On May 8, 2012 Alpine filed a lien against MMTC's patent, anyone can file a lien on a patent, anyone, it does not mean the patent is lost. On January 29, 2013 MMTC filed suit against Alpine alleging among other things that the lien on the patent is unauthorized The lawsuit also names the managing director and managing member of Alpine as Defendants and alleges that they made false promises, intentional misrepresentations and breached the contract which is the subject of the Texas suit. The Company is seeking damages of $1.6 million. This lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase. It's all in the filings in black and white for all to see. MMTC still has all of its patents, its an absolute fact and your information is incorrect. We'll see how this play out in court, with Alpines shady past I'm sure the case will be a walk in the park for MMTC, MMTC is seeking damages of 1.6 Million and the lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase. See the following from the most recent 10Q...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On May 16, 2012, Alpine MIT Partners, LLC (Plaintiffs) filed a civil action against the Company and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey G. Nunez, (collectively, the Company), in the Texas District Court, Travis County. Plaintiffs alleged breach of contract and civil conspiracy, as well as tortious interference with contractual relations and prospective business relations. The lawsuit alleges that the Company breached certain provisions of a March 7, 2012 Securities Purchase Agreement the Company executed with the Plaintiff to sell up to $2.0 million of 7% Senior Secured five-year Convertible Debentures convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of $.003 per share. The purchase and sale of the first $1.0 million Debenture was scheduled to close on or before April 6, 2012 and was subject to, among other things, Alpine closing the necessary equity funding to consummate the transactions. No money was ever received by the Company from Alpine. At a March 7, 2013 hearing, the Texas court upheld the Company’s argument and dismissed the complaint against the Company for lack of jurisdiction.

In August, 2013, Alpine filed an amended Complaint against Jeffrey Nunez in the Texas case alleging tortuous interference and conspiracy to terminate the March 7, 2012 Securities Purchase Agreement.

On January 10, 2013, the Company learned that Plaintiffs had filed a lien against the Company’s patents on May 8, 2012 with the California Secretary of State under the Uniform Commercial Code. On or about January 29, 2013, the Company filed suit against Alpine MIT Partners, LLC in the Orange County, California Superior Court alleging, among other claims, that the UCC filing is unauthorized. The lawsuit also names the managing director and managing member of Alpine as Defendants and alleges that they made false promises, intentional misrepresentations and breached the contract which is the subject of the Texas suit. The Company is seeking damages of $1.6 million. This lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase.