While I believe that article to be substantially true, I am somewhat peeved that they have used my own words from a post on this MB without acknowledgement. Bad form, I think.
There isn't anything new on SCAM.COM that hasn't been fed slowly over time to this board.They seem to come from the same source. All may be true but I don't buy the altruistic information gatherers. My opinion only.
In the complaint, see paragraphs 116 (p 35 of 58) and paragraph 147 (p 42/58). Exhibits 27 and and 37 can be found on p 24-26 and p 93 of Exhibits part 2 of 2.
It looks like Roth, Renuen and Mike Irving are the good guys. It will be very interesting to see how this jury trial proceeds.