Replies to post #178050 on MyECheck, Inc. (fka MYEC)

[B RY]

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=20080306839.PGNR.

[PhenixBleu]

MYEC is the Granted Patent Assignee!

All anyone needs to do is READ the sections on the page BRY linked to realize that patents can be enhanced.

https://www.google.com/patents/US20080306839?hl=en&dq=ininventor:%22Ed+Starrs%22

The quote below is beneath the caption DESCRIPTION on the above linked page.

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 as a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/413,673, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ONLINE CHECK PROCESSING,” filed on Apr. 28, 2006, the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The application number that was granted is in red font (serial number), and is the same application noted in Whitefish's Post 177834.

In summary, all of the numbers being posted are related to the same invention.

Continuation-in-part

A "continuation-in-part" application ("CIP" or "CIP application") is one in which the applicant adds subject matter not disclosed in the parent, but repeats substantial portion of the parent's specification, and shares at least one inventor with the parent application. The CIP application is a convenient way to claim enhancements developed after the parent application was filed. It is the successor to the earlier "additional improvement" patents mentioned above. For a continuation-in-part application, claims to subject matter that was also disclosed in the parent are entitled to the parent’s priority date, while claims to the additional subject matter are only entitled to the filing date of the CIP application.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_patent_application