Replies to post #258041 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

so should we read the change in direction of the tea leaves

(again I have never felt it was a policy act by BO to not want F and F healthy and alive - but one from Geithner and others from the street who disliked F and F or still smelled some of the old scandal. again - one article says F and F will do better under REPS - that means v a fed agency sure - that means if its framed as a private property taking sure .... but REPS hate F and F )

(Dems - like BO they turned on F and F when it appeared F and F were a major cause of the mess. Now that we know that is not true the big 4 DEMS on the senate committee said do not mess with F and F --- and I think - I hope - this more more F and F is a sign the administration is shifting its policy to F and F plus more --- v more without F and F)

the key again IMO as taken from what I think is Maloni


Hasn’t America seen this picture before, say in 1992 and later when the Bush and then Clinton administrations leaned on F&F to do more for low income and minority families?

Given this regulatory reinvigoration, what will the Obama Admin do when the next US Senator or GOP Member asks for F&F to be shut down or phased out??