97 Million shares....
I don't know BCS, it seems like an awfully lot of shares for someone to not tell whomever is holding them for them to vote one way or the other. Its as if they want the company, but at what price?
We know have a couple "groups" here.
1) It looks like we have a "group" of shareholders... all possibly with less than 5%, probably just under that 5%
2) and all those shares are not at one location, so they are held at another "group" of SEC registered brokers possibly? and if all these entities or "group" are holding shares for another "group" off shore, are they not legally required to report this to the SEC?
I say yes.... and I gave an example of this on my original post that the SEC actually went after the "group" of entities that were holding shares for a "group" of people, all under that 5%
Damn... I'll be on this freezing of shares again for the next month after seeing that.
No wonder why no Big Pharma will offer up a price, they know that the real owners of the company already, possibly own 97 Million shares and can doubler their offer by still paying the same price!
No wonder why we are the #1 read IHUB board, how many readers are from those off shore accounts? lol
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
