InvestorsHub Logo

_mmech

10/16/14 10:09 AM

#28034 RE: joshgets46 #28033

you may want to explore the differences between fission and fusion

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Nuclear_Fission_vs_Nuclear_Fusion

Big Casino 1518

10/16/14 10:50 AM

#28035 RE: joshgets46 #28033

Yes I do. I also remember those being nuclear FISSION reactors.

Fusion will not create a meltdown, and the minute waste created has a half-life of only 13 years. It uses hydrogen atoms (tritium) rather than uranium.

Fusion cannot cause runaway reactions like fission can. If there is a loss of control in a fusion reactor, the reaction will be starved of energy and will instantly shut down, by itself. Fusion reactors are passively stable, meaning that they require no action from operators for a safe shutdown.



http://www.fusionfuture.org/fusion-faq/

I think this has a much more probable use in the very near future as the people of the planet demand reliable green energy. Biomass has its uses in small amounts in small countries, but not on a large scale.

GKG will never be used LARGE SCALE.