InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JJSeabrook

10/15/14 11:44 AM

#55946 RE: Long-vestor #55944

How do you figure citing SCOTUS opinions and the CAFC's own precedent setting opinions as a basis for rehearing en banc due to the panel decision "weak?"
icon url

piratica

10/15/14 12:13 PM

#55952 RE: Long-vestor #55944

Long-vestor, it looks to me by your answers that you do not believe in our Judicial System. It has been proved the patent office has verified the patents them over and over, the jury and the judge have rendered a guilty veredict against Google. Here come the two judges in the appeals court and have taken upon themselves to overturn a Judge and a Jury for oviousness that they can not explain. We'll see you in higher courts, watch the whole game. The fat lady has not sung yet. GLTA VRNG'S long.
icon url

Long-vestor

10/16/14 4:31 PM

#56002 RE: Long-vestor #55944

And yet once more, another NAIL on the head stone.. tks fer the ride,, it'll have to do better, much better! before me rides this reading once more.. ! ! but nothing likes the good times, flipper's choice, riding em up an riding em down, bronco!

(disclaimer: while I didn't actually short this, I did NAIL the bottom .67-8 target, )


see quote.

Regardless the triple bottom dead cat bounce has a resistance at .92. That's as far as the momentum, market conscience, consensus is willing to risk.. If that fails, then look for triple bottom's conformation on dips back down at a .67-8 warning,, that it aint in hell yet.