InvestorsHub Logo

dloggold

10/14/14 10:42 PM

#83361 RE: tdbowieknife #83360

All that says Is mark Cuban and Chris whatever do not have personal stakes . No disclaimer for any offshore hedgefund in which they may have shekels parked.

bigdaddy21c

10/15/14 10:59 AM

#83384 RE: tdbowieknife #83360

Quote:
Mark Cuban, majority owner of Sharesleuth.com LLC, has no position, short or long, in any of the companies mentioned in this story. Chris Carey, editor of Sharesleuth, does not invest in individual stocks and has no position in any of the companies mentioned.)

Actually that's not true. The story started out talking about Kandi Technologies. Here is a quote from that article: "Mark Cuban, majority owner of Sharesleuth.com LLC, has recently taken a short position in Kandi’s shares."

SCHNAUSER

10/15/14 3:07 PM

#83415 RE: tdbowieknife #83360

TD, it looks like the tailpipe is blowing smoke again. Cuban has nothing to do with Treaty. That could be part of the reason Cuban is wealthy and Treaty Energy Corp is broke. Smart investors don't lose their money on penny stock scams like Treaty.

bullmarket2222

10/22/14 3:34 PM

#83806 RE: tdbowieknife #83360

But don't expect reporters to thank Carey. In old media circles, Sharesleuth is considered just as compromised as the companies it covers. The beef: Sharesleuth is funded by Mark Cuban, the infamous Broadcast.com founder and Dallas Mavericks owner. Cuban finances the site by shorting the stocks of the companies Carey investigates in his stories. And Cuban trades before Carey publishes. (Short sellers are betting a stock will fall; they borrow the stock from a broker and sell it, with the promise to buy the stock later — hopefully, at a lower price — and return it to the broker.) Carey and Cuban disclose the financing technique on the site, but that hasn't stemmed the criticism. On his blog, The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin dubbed the strategy "about as basic an ethical violation as there can be, whether that stake is disclosed or not." Blogger Gary Weiss, a former BusinessWeek reporter, accuses Cuban of "soiling investigative journalism to line his pockets." Fred Brown, vice chair of the ethics committee of the Society of Professional Journalists, a trade group, warns that "Mr. Cuban is eating the fruit of the poison tree."

Cuban has never been known to duck a fight, and you can almost hear the glee in his email as he responds to these charges. He says that business journalists are either blind or naive to the role they play in boosting the stocks of the companies they cover, which employ legions of public relations staffers to influence media coverage. "You just leave all the gain to the interviewee using you to move the price of a stock in a profitable direction for them," he writes. "You pay for the newsprint and postage by selling ads for products that you know nothing about and hope they work. How is that working out for your industry these days?"