Just where am I wrong? If ABX sold billions of dollars under the price their shareholders owned stock and could buy shares for how is that not toxic?
Then you say NBRI should be able to do what Barrick couldn't do???
LMAO your 100% wrong but just can't see it for some reason.
Anyone else here think Barrick selling billions of $ of shares under the price anyone else could buy wasn't toxic? The owners in Barrick lost billions in this deal. NBRI hasn't done nearly the same amount of monetary damage that deal has caused.
All I am saying is If ABX can't do it why should anyone think NBRI could??