That is exactly correct and what been waiting for. Whether or not it happens time will tell. Until he fully aligns and commits to GRCU it will remain stagnant. Of course, I hope he does so.
The answer to that question should be fairly obvious. Why would anyone who serves as CEO of a publicly traded company for which they own a tiny percentage of the shares (4 million of about 1.6 billion for his first year's service) surrender a private company he has built?
I follow hundreds of fortune 500 companies, and I can't say that I've ever seen a CEO turn over a private company which they've built to the public company in which they own a small percentage.
I'd like to try and answer this another way, using an analogy. Let's say someone owns a timeshare property (for one week a year), in addition to their primary residence.
Would it be prudent for them to take valuable personal assets, and gift them to the timeshare property for which they only own a one-week-per-year interest (thereby sharing those assets with up to 51 other families), or keep those valuable personal assets at their primary residence, for enjoyment throughout the year?
This is why I would be extremely surprised if Robert Calkin would simply fold CCI into Green Cures, as a gift.