You are correct, eatbytes. The "5 years" phrasing IMO is a worst case generalized time frame that as I stated before includes the present. Some important events that may have occurred regarding both the approval process and the time proximity of human clinical trials cannot be publicized because either the content involves people that will not approve the use of their names in the press release or, and there is a fine line here, the piece would be considered to be advertising rather than news. I'm just saying that the company has a plan for both and is moving forward on both plans. I think it is a shame that some of these could not be publicized, because of the positive effect they could have had on the pps.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
