InvestorsHub Logo

rolvram

10/08/14 8:57 AM

#17727 RE: IPobserver #17726

Need to dig out all correspondence and comments pertaing to the patent in question which is available through the USPTO website but:

For applications filed before November 29, 2000, it is the version of 37 CFR 1.78, which was in effect on November 28, 2000, that applies. The pre-November 29, 2000 version reads as follows:

Former 37 C.F.R. 1.78
(a)
(1) A nonprovisional application may claim an invention disclosed in one or more prior filed copending nonprovisional applications or copending international applications designating the United States of America. In order for a nonprovisional application to claim the benefit of a prior filed copending nonprovisional application or copending international application designating the United States of America, each prior application must name as an inventor at least one inventor named in the later filed nonprovisional application and disclose the named inventor’s invention claimed in at least one claim of the later filed nonprovisional application in the manner provided by the first paragraph of . In addition, each prior application must be:
(i) An international application entitled to a filing date in accordance with and designating the United States of America; or
(ii) Complete as set forth in § 1.51(b); or
(iii) Entitled to a filing date as set forth in § 1.53(b) or § 1.53(d) and include the basic filing fee set forth in § 1.16; or
(iv) Entitled to a filing date as set forth in § 1.53(b) and have paid therein the processing and retention fee set forth in § 1.21(l) within the time period set forth in § 1.53(f).
(2) Except for a continued prosecution application filed under § 1.53(d), any nonprovisional application claiming the benefit of one or more prior filed copending nonprovisional applications or international applications designating the United States of America must contain a reference to each such prior application, identifying it by application number (consisting of the series code and serial number) or international application number and international filing date and indicating the relationship of the applications. Unless the reference required by this paragraph is included in an application data sheet (§ ), the specification must contain or be amended to contain such reference in the first sentence following any title. The request for a continued prosecution application under § 1.53(d) is the specific reference required by to the prior application. The identification of an application by application number under this section is the specific reference required by to every application assigned that application number. Cross-references to other related applications may be made when appropriate (see § 1.14(a)).

rolvram

10/08/14 9:03 AM

#17729 RE: IPobserver #17726

found that someone already did the research: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=93319794

DataStream

10/08/14 9:13 AM

#17731 RE: IPobserver #17726

This matter has already been decided by the court in the MSJ ruling.
It will be appealed under the application of equitable powers.