Replies to post #74343 on Ocata Therapeutics Inc fka OCAT

[farviewhill]

I totally agree with his post and also encourage a "yes' vote.

We all would like a positive pr of a material event, but I'm thinking more and more that if it was to happen, it would have happened already, i.e., before voting started, as it couldn't be criticized by the SEC as being an vote influencing action, and as the company must announce a 'material event', according to other knowledgeable posters.

Having said that, if that's a valid statement,then it seems to me Wotton needs the approval of the 'new' shares as a part of consummating a new partnership, perhaps with TEVA, as has been conjectured.

So, failing to believe in the best and most skilled management we've had since day one and voting 'no', is a huge mistake imo and those considering that should carefully reconsider, imo.

Folks, ask yourself why Wotton left Antares and what the ACTC Board charged him with and the apparent stellar TLD he has to negotiate with, not to mention the huge arsenal of promising and secure patents, and that clearly leads to a 'yes' vote.