This is some tidbits from this filing... ---> **these are my comments**
GAMEZNFLIX INC - 10KSB (Filed: 01-02-2006) **wondering how 14, 15 employees handle 30,00 subs?** ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. The Company currently owns $506,965 in fixed assets and $786,859 ($2,041,277 less amortization of $1,254,418) of DVD and video games inventory. Our corporate office is located in Franklin, Kentucky at the chief executive officer's home-based office.; we do not pay rent for this office. Our distribution centers are located at:
California: 308 West 5th Street, Holtville, California; five year lease, with a rent of $1,200 per month for a 1,600 square foot space.
Colorado: 18234 Road 24, Sterling, Colorado; one year lease, with a rent of $2,000 per month for a 1,000 square foot space.
Kentucky: 130 West Kentucky Ave, Franklin, Kentucky; five year lease, with a rent of $3,150 per month for a 4,200 square foot space.
Pennsylvania: 225 Vine Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania; one year lease, with a rent of $350.00 per month for a 700 square foot space.
**Where did that 6000 subs number come from?** (a) Revenues. The Company reported revenues of $676,291 and $287,117 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, an increase of $389,174 or approximately 135%. Revenues were primarily derived from monthly subscription fees. Revenues increased in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily due to a full year of operations compared to three months of operations in 2004. During the course of 2005 our subscriber base averaged approximately 3,000 subscribers per month.
**pretty much kept in the family huh?** e) Consulting and Professional Fees. The Company reported consulting and professional fees of $1,188,335 and $4,353,911 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, a decrease of $3,165,576 or approximately 73%. Decrease in consulting and professional fees in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily a result of business consultants hired in 2004 to develop our business model. ** This consultant is Mr. De Joya, an officer of GZFX**
**Maybe Fleming could reduce his salary, or sell off a few million to finance some advertizing, I see netflix and gamefly (or whatever its called) every other day.** ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company's common stock as of December 31, 2005 (3,291,733,490 issued and outstanding) by (i) all shareholders known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each director and executive officer; and (iii) all officers and directors of the Company as a group. Each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by him
Title of Name and Address of Amount and Nature Percent of Class Beneficial Owner of Beneficial Class Owner (1)
Common Stock John Fleming 126,400,000 (2) 3.84% 1535 Blackjack Road, Franklin, Kentucky 42134 ***you should notice these are not restricted***
I own this stock too. And I'm wondering why there is no news about CC program. Wouldn't something this big and complicated have some sort of pr or outside news somewhere... How is the general public going to know to come to CC for such a great deal... I go to CC in Michigan, and see different vendors every time, and I wonder where in the store gzfx displays will live.?
Seeing that we are looking into opposites....Is there a way to dis-membermark a poster? Not remove a membermark.... Just something to remind me that I would rather not read that persons posts?
I suppose this could really make us wonder who's really on whose side... who's in cahoots with who? One basher and a number of pumpers all working together. Who can we trust?
Each of us sat in a small half-cubicle in a cluster with our teammates. Each group (usually five people) was made of three beginners (two who would bash and one who would hype),
Sometimes, we would throw in a hypster Pitchfork such as MONEYMADE and laptop and a pumper like Datatech to create the illusion of an argument going on.
The idea was to get "play," i.e. reaction from other posters. The more play we got, the more the room would be disrupted. Ignored posters get no play. One exception would be the hypsters since they were "defending" the stock against our onslaught, they got a little more leeway. People would side with the hypster because they thought he was real since he appeared to be on their side, but was really on ours, setting us up to disrupt the room