Replies to post #136894 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[fastpathguru]

But no one would argue that selling anything at a loss is a "subsidy." You're still stuck in the antitrust line of thinking.

WTF is wrong with you people?

Intel's contra-revenue is a "subsidy" that makes up for the extra BOM requirements Intel's mobile chips need.

This is according to wbmw. I'm using HIS definition. It doesn't change anything.

If OEM's had to eat the extra cost of building products around Intel's mobile chips, they would not have purchased as many, if any.

(Unless you think Intel is just giving them the contra-revenue "just 'cause they're that classy.")

fpg