InvestorsHub Logo

geocappy1

09/30/14 2:10 PM

#192179 RE: dia76ca #192177

that is all well and good, however, the question is whether or not there is a better way to get the job done. Is there a way to have the pps at a higher number so dilution is not so destructive to the current SHs. I do not know the answer and I think they do a terrible job of explaining that part of the equation to the SH. Why not explain in one of the CCs or ASm that they have had interest, however, the BPs are not being realistic. Explain to the SHs why they have not partnered to this point. Is it because the BPs want more info, want to pay little, or something else.

IMO the problem has been lack of communication in the past and part of that is they know that Delaware law insulates them from having to be better when dealing with the SHs.

entdoc

09/30/14 2:54 PM

#192184 RE: dia76ca #192177

another good one. thanks dia76ca

majatamata

09/30/14 3:00 PM

#192187 RE: dia76ca #192177


http://www.cel-sci.com/enrollment_chart.html

Here is one. Some provide exact numbers. Risky if you show that your not going to hit your goal, but provides transparency. New number should be coming out tomorrow or Thursday.