Replies to post #235257 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)

[Nikodemos]

Wow!! Couldn't find this eh? Maybe if I BLOW IT UP for ya:




How's that? Now for the REST of the FACTS for 2day:
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/prnewswire/CL24534.htm

https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=127023

https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=127022




NTEK

[frontloading]

BIG previously replied that he has never been compensated to promote any stock, let alone $250k from ntek to satisfy contract...nice deal at .033 per share..

[underdog150]

Hmmm, what was that previously entered into contract?
--------------------
NTEK has a serious reporting disclosure problem:

Quote:
On April 10, 2014 the Company issued 13,580,000 shares of restricted common stock containing the restrictive legend to
meet a variety of contractual obligations, which were distributed as follows:

Issued Bennie Blankenship, unrelated and non-affiliated investor, 7,580,000 shares of restricted common stock
containing the restrictive legend, at $0.033 per share, as part of obligations under a previously entered into
contract as well as increasing the company’s cash by $250,000.

[shajandr]

BIG problem for the compensated NTEK frontloader and promoter.

Issued Bennie Blankenship, unrelated and non-affiliated investor, 7,580,000 shares of restricted common stock
containing the restrictive legend, at $0.033 per share, as part of obligations under a previously entered into
contract as well as increasing the company’s cash by $250,000.

Reminds me of the Monk and his legal problems and stock manipulation issues. Same MO.

BIG problem.