1. So two officers were quoted from national standard in the press release -- Neither of whom say anything about the funding Nat Std is allegedly going to supply. I just think that's weird.
2. It says the company will put out a TIMELINE which you see in the s/1 -- Six months from now, a la SWET, I'm going to publish a timeline for purchasing that $1.5M house I really like.
3. THIS HOLE THATS BEING DUG IS GOING TO NEED MORE THAN A LADDER TO GET OUT OF NOW -- If I am digging a hole, maybe I'll put in a pool with all that money I'm going to make when SWET pops.
4. It is my opinion SWET was very clear and not misleading at all in this press release. -- Why didn't it say in the PR that it had a letter of intent? If it had the letter of intent in March, why did it wait until May to issue the PR? Why did it wait four months from the date of the PR to even mention in an SEC filing its arrangement with Nat Std only to have to amend that filing less than two weeks later to finally say it had a non-binding letter of intent?
The whole thing just stinks. But if I wind up with a pool, I'm guessing it'll wash the stench away.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
