No, You never used the word "judge" but you said the reason the OS did not increase for a year was because of MEDT's litigation in post number 33418. The only meaning someone could derive from your statement is the judge halted conversion because as you just said the debt holders only care about themselves so why would they care MEDT was litigating? They wouldn't! Yet there was no increase in OS ie no conversions. Again, where is your prove that litigation was the reason conversion was halted? Let's see the court docket!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
