Yet you previously argued the only reason the conversions and OS increases hadn't happened was the judge in the court case they won had halted all conversions. Of course, you offered no proof this was what happened. If the debt holders can't be stopped, why would a court stop conversions from holders unrelated to the ongoing litigation at the time? The point is there has been no increase in the OS for a year and relatively little in quite some time previous. So your argument is these debt holders have sat back "un paid" all this time without converting but now they are going to convert and destroy their own investment as the company is finally making progress again?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
