Gotcha, thanks but I think it should go the other way, the article needs to be re-written.
The article definitely needs to be re-written.
Chang's statement about the value of the Gibraltar patents was given when he was guesstimating how much they would derive in annual licensing revenue, right?
Why provide a quote from back in the day that is simply not applicable to the current status of the portfolio (e.g. 6 patents now awarded)? Dig Gibraltar was still awaiting the goodies.