I know that the evidence and testimony was in favor of Doral but will the judge be fair or does she have ulterior motives?
Most of our info has been snippets from twitter. Muddlaw and Gaurdiola, who attended the case were giving a play by play.
Muddlaw said that the favor was clearly for Doral. But this morning he was interviewed on a public radio station about it and my translator is giving me this:
I don't know which way this is leaning... like much of the translated twitter feeds during the case, but those that were on the fence went toward Doral.