Replies to post #30547 on Sierra Resource Group Inc. (fka SIRG)

[Stargazer1945]

I also noticed that on the gold mine project listed with Red Rock, as a matter of fact I could not find who really owned the gold mine, at least with the Chloride mine you can get back to SIRG. The warrant was for the 80% of mine ownership, the remaining 20% should still be part of SIRG since it was the last parcel bought and not part of the warrant, at least as I remember. Its all very confusing and as the man said we will not know until management speaks...

[jufel]

...but in several of the KC and RRA paragraphs it mentions Chloride, but not SIRG...

Remember all permits were granted to SIRG.

IMO, Other owner would have to restart the whole process from ZERO

Sometimes One party request the other not to mention its name when the other PR.....


IMO everything remains OK to me!!