almost there, but slightly tweaked and slightly corrected where you are mixing apples and oranges:
Win or lose - we will elicit the following information from the jury:
1) Infringement (found/not found) related to each individual claim in question
2) Validity/invalidity of each claim/patent
3) With a win on validity and infringement of any claim, damages to Rambus with the goal of "making Rambus whole" (also interest to be paid on the award)
Almost certainly with a win, Rambus will ask Whyte to enter an injunction to prevent any manufacture or sale (irrespective of place of manufacture) of the infringing products in the USA.
Then, as a separate matter entirely, Rambus MAY CHOOSE TO ENTER INTO a future licensing agreement, however they choose to structure it, as long as they can come to an agreement w/ Hynix. If agreement cannot be reached, oh well.
=============
Please correct me if I am wrong. Witha win, we will elicit the following information from the jury/verdict:
1) Infringement related to each individual claim in question
2) Validity of each claim/patent
3) Damages with the goal of "making Rambus whole"
Then, Rambus will obtain a future licensing agreement for X% royalties, or file an injunction on production thereof.<>