InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Mizzlie73

09/19/14 3:54 PM

#43419 RE: Bjams09 #43417

If it is for just mcig. That is very impressive. I hope that is the case. I was very concerned about the the low revenues.
icon url

Retodd Esq

09/19/14 3:55 PM

#43420 RE: Bjams09 #43417

I was pondering that except they included vitacig in the annual report revs and this current PR seems to state that they are including revenues of the same entities as their past filings had included; which would mean that Vitacig revenues are included in these figures since they were included in the annual figures as filed with the SEC.
icon url

GrundleHunter

09/19/14 4:53 PM

#43432 RE: Bjams09 #43417

I thought the same thing.

But, i'm pretty much a noob when it comes to a lot of this stuff. I realize they can exclude the vapulation sales, can they do the same with vitacig?

It would make sense seeing as they are trying to get the S1 finalized.

Again, i might be way off.